Skip to content



When some Member States of the European Union decided, in 1999, to revive the Community Patent project, which had been dormant since 1975, a handful of patent litigation practitioners felt that they should offer their assistance for such an ambitious plan.


On 10 March 2000, 20 lawyers from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom, invited by Pierre Véron, convened in his Paris office, at that time at Square de l’Opéra. Shortly thereafter they decided to create an association so that their voices could be better heard. After some debate , they decided to take the name “European Patent Lawyers Association” (EPLA); the articles of incorporation were executed on 23 July 2001.


A few months later, the members of the Working Party on Litigation set up by the European Patent Office who had christened their project “European Patent Litigation Protocol” (EPLP) considered that the name Protocol was no longer suitable and decided to call their future baby “European Patent Litigation Agreement” (EPLA). The lawyers’ association was left with no other option than either to sue several EU Member States or to change its name. As professional litigators, the members know that litigation is not always the best way to start building a strong and friendly relationship; the association therefore decided to change its acronym to EPLAW, its current name.

2001 – 2005

In the early years of the 21st century, the EPLAW built a very strong and confident relationship with the European Union Commission, with the European Patent Office and with the European patent judges and their Intellectual Property Judges’ Association.

An important achievement of this cooperation was the creation of the European Patent Judges’ Forum in Venice which has been held every year on the San Servolo Island since 2005 thanks to the initiative of Mario Franzosi.


4 November 2006: Venice Forum
European Patent Judges approve the principles of the Rules of Procedure


Drafting Process: RoP 1-5

EU Commission’s Expert group of Judges, Lawyers and Business Representatives including a number of familiar EPLAW faces


Drafting Process: RoP 6-15

Judges and Lawyers, again with a heavy EPLAW presence (Willem Hoyng, Pierre Veron,Kevin Mooney and Winfried Tilmann)

RoP Draft 16

Reviewed and Modified by the Preparatory Committee

Drafting Process: Versions 17+

EPLAW continued to play a significant role in the finalisation of the rules

EPLAW Patent Blog

Get the latest European patent law developments